Jean II
Compartir
1. Who was Jean II, and why does he matter?
Jean II (1319 to 1364), known to history as Jean le Bon, the Good, was King of France from 1350 until his death in England in 1364. He matters above all because his reign represents one of the most catastrophic passages in French medieval history, a period in which the kingdom came closer to total dissolution than at almost any other moment before the Revolution. He faced simultaneous disasters on a scale that would have broken most institutions: the Black Death, which killed between a third and a half of the French population; the Hundred Years War against England at its most relentless; peasant revolt; financial collapse; noble rebellion; and the physical capture of the king himself on the battlefield. His reign produced some of the most consequential political upheaval of the fourteenth century, not through any design of his own, but through his absence and his failures, which forced France to improvise institutions and find resources it had not previously known it possessed.
2. What were Jean's origins, and what kind of man was he?
Jean was born on 26 April 1319 near Le Mans, the son of Philippe VI, the first Valois king, and Jeanne of Burgundy. He was made Duke of Normandy in 1332 at the age of thirteen and married Bonne of Bohemia the same year, a match chosen for its diplomatic advantages. His first wife died of the Black Death in 1349, and the following year he married Jeanne of Auvergne, becoming king on his father's death in August 1350. Contemporary sources describe Jean as personally brave, devoted to the chivalric ideals of his era, impulsive in judgement, and ill-suited to the political and financial complexities of governing a kingdom at war. He was generous to his favourites to a degree that generated intense resentment, deeply attached to personal honour as he understood it, and prone to decisions driven more by emotion than calculation. His very nickname, the Good, is thought by most historians to refer to his qualities as a knight rather than as a ruler: it was a chivalric compliment rather than an administrative assessment.
3. What was the context Jean II inherited when he came to the throne?
When Jean became king in 1350, France had already been at war with England for thirteen years. Edward III of England had asserted his claim to the French crown through his mother, Isabelle of France, triggering what became the Hundred Years War. France had already suffered the devastating defeat of Crécy in 1346, where the English longbow had obliterated the finest of French chivalry. The port of Calais had fallen to the English after a long siege in the same year. Then came the Black Death, which arrived in France in 1348 and swept through the population with catastrophic speed, killing perhaps twelve million people and devastating the economic, agricultural, and administrative fabric of the kingdom. One of Jean's first acts as king was the summary execution of Raoul de Brienne, the Constable of France, on charges that were never publicly explained and which many contemporaries found deeply disturbing. His reign began, in short, in an atmosphere of war, plague, grief, and uncertain royal authority.
4. Who was Charles of Navarre, and why was he such a persistent threat?
The most damaging internal enemy of Jean's reign was his own son-in-law, Charles II of Navarre, known to history as Charles the Bad. Charles held extensive lands in Normandy in addition to his small Pyrenean kingdom, and believed he had a better claim to the French crown than the Valois. He was intelligent, unscrupulous, and perfectly willing to ally with England against France whenever it served his purposes. The relationship between Jean and Charles was one of mutual hatred broken by occasional forced truces, each of which promptly collapsed. In 1354 Charles was implicated in the assassination of the Constable of France, Charles de la Cerda, who had been Jean's personal favourite. Jean eventually had Charles arrested and imprisoned in 1356, but his son, the Dauphin, released him the following year in an attempt to stabilise the political situation, and Charles resumed his intrigues immediately. His combination of legal pretensions, Norman support, and willingness to negotiate with England made him a chronic drain on Jean's resources and political credibility throughout the reign.
5. What happened at the Battle of Poitiers, and how was Jean captured?
In the summer of 1356 the Black Prince, Edward of Woodstock, led an English and Gascon army on a destructive chevauchée through the Loire valley, ravaging the countryside and demonstrating the impotence of the French crown. Jean assembled a large army and pursued him, bringing him to battle near Poitiers on 19 September 1356. The French forces outnumbered the English substantially, and Jean chose to attack with much of his cavalry dismounted, in an effort to neutralise the advantage the English longbow had provided at Crécy. The tactic failed. The English position on a ridge with their flanks protected was extremely strong, and the French advance lost cohesion. At a critical moment the Gascon captain Jean de Grailly, the Captal de Buch, led a concealed cavalry force in a flanking attack that shattered the French formation. Jean fought on with extraordinary personal bravery, his fourteen-year-old son Philippe at his side, but was surrounded, captured, and taken prisoner. Geoff roi de Charny, bearer of the Oriflamme, died holding the standard of France as the army collapsed around him.
6. What happened to France while Jean was a prisoner in England?
The consequences of Poitiers for France were catastrophic, and they extended far beyond the battlefield. Jean was taken to London in April 1357 and lodged at the Savoy Palace in considerable comfort, while France descended into what contemporaries described as near-anarchy. The Dauphin Charles, barely eighteen and without experience or resources, was left as regent. The Estates General, furious at what they saw as years of royal mismanagement, attempted to impose radical constitutional reforms led by Étienne Marcel, the Provost of Merchants of Paris, who sought to make the crown answerable to a council drawn from nobles, clergy, and bourgeois. Mercenary companies of unemployed soldiers, the Grandes Compagnies, rampaged across the countryside extorting and pillaging. Then, in May 1358, the countryside north of Paris exploded in the uprising known as the Jacquerie: peasants, driven by a lethal combination of plague losses, war damage, new taxes, and contempt for a nobility that had failed to protect them, rose in violent revolt against their lords. The Dauphin suppressed these crises one by one with considerable skill, but France had come close to complete collapse.
7. What were the terms of the Treaty of Brétigny, and what did they cost France?
After failed earlier peace negotiations, including two draft treaties so harsh that the Estates General refused to ratify them, a final agreement was reached at Brétigny near Chartres in May 1360 and ratified at Calais in October. The Treaty of Brétigny was the most damaging settlement France had accepted since the beginning of the Hundred Years War. Jean's ransom was fixed at three million gold écus, roughly two to three years of the French crown's entire revenue, the largest such sum ever demanded of a French king. In exchange for his freedom, France ceded to England sovereign control of vast territories in the southwest, including most of Aquitaine, Poitou, and other provinces, to be held free of any obligation of French suzerainty. Edward III, for his part, formally renounced his claim to the French crown. As security for payment of the ransom, Jean provided hostages including two of his sons, the Dukes of Anjou and Berry, several great nobles, and prominent citizens from nineteen French towns. It was a devastating settlement, and the territories ceded would take a generation to recover.
8. What did Jean do during his captivity in England?
Jean's conduct during his captivity in London has been extensively documented through a set of household accounts kept by his secretary, and what they reveal is striking. While France was convulsed by crisis, Jean maintained a full royal household, purchased horses, jewels, and fine clothing, kept a court astrologer and a court band, attended tournaments, and lived what one historian called the life of a cheerful royal guest rather than a captive king. He was treated with great courtesy by Edward III, who was genuinely fond of him, and the two men shared the same chivalric world. Jean's account books record expenditure on entertainment and luxury at a moment when his kingdom was finding it nearly impossible to raise money for its own defence. On his return to France in 1360 he introduced significant reforms, including the creation of the franc as a stable new currency, but he did not substantially change the habits of mind that had shaped his captivity.
9. Why did Jean return voluntarily to England, and how did he die?
After the Treaty of Brétigny, Jean returned to France but left his son Louis of Anjou in Calais as a hostage guaranteeing continued ransom payments. In 1362 Louis escaped his captivity. When Jean was informed, he convened his royal council and announced that he would return voluntarily to England to honour the bond his son had violated. His councillors argued against it. Jean’s response, as recorded by the chroniclers, was that if good faith had been banished from the earth, it ought to find refuge in the hearts of kings. He returned to London in January 1364 and was welcomed by Edward III. He fell ill shortly after his arrival, dying on 8 April 1364 at the Savoy Palace. His body was returned to France with great ceremony and buried at Saint-Denis. His voluntary return to English captivity has fascinated historians ever since: it can be read as the supreme expression of chivalric honour, as political theatre designed to appease his English creditors, or simply as the act of a man whose deepest instincts were those of a knight rather than a sovereign.
10. What is Jean II's legacy, and how has history judged him?
Jean II is one of the most contested figures in French medieval history, and the judgments passed on him depend heavily on what is expected of a medieval king. The harshest verdicts, established by nineteenth-century historians building on the bias of Jean Froissart's chronicles, portray him as a weak, extravagant, and reckless ruler who brought catastrophe on France through military incompetence and political misjudgement. The more sympathetic readings point out that almost nothing that happened during his reign was straightforwardly his fault: he inherited a kingdom already at war, was struck by the worst plague in European history, faced an opponent in Edward III and the Black Prince of exceptional military genius, and was surrounded by nobles whose loyalty was conditional at best. His genuine personal courage is beyond question. What his reign produced, unintentionally, was also significant: the crises of the 1350s forced the French state to develop fiscal mechanisms, institutional forms, and practical political thinking that laid the groundwork for the more effective monarchy of his son Charles V. Jean's failures were, in the end, the crucible in which a more resilient France was slowly forged.